Eyes for Lies Blog: February 2011

Monday, February 28, 2011

Tiffany Hartley Speaks Out About New Life
by Eyes at 8:18 AM

Thanks, Karon, for the link.

Labels: David Hartley, Missing Person, murder, Tiffany Hartley

Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.

Permalink

Social Bookmarking Links Newer Posts Older Posts

Friday, February 25, 2011

Ryan Widmer's 911 Call
by Eyes at 11:52 AM

Ryan Widmer, 30, stood trial three times for the murder of his wife, Sarah, 24. On August 11, 2008, his wife was found unresponsive in their bathtub in Ohio. The first time Ryan was convicted, but that conviction was overturned. The second time, the jury was hung and now the third time, Widmer was convicted this month again, and he was sentenced to 15 years to life.

I have been asked to take a look at the 911 call.

Read moreWhen you listen to the 911 call, its interesting. Ryan says, "My wife, ah, fell asleep in the bathtub and I think she's dead."

How would he know that she fell asleep? Notice he doesn't speculate when he says it? I find that interesting. Second, he thinks she is dead? He didn't check--he doesn't know for sure? Last, notice his lack of interest to get an ambulance immediately to try to save her? That's a huge red flag.

A few seconds later, Ryan says, "Yeah, she fell asleep in the bathtub, I think. I was downstairs and I just came up here and found her and she was laying face down in the bathtub."

Notice the afterthought of the words, "I think"?

When people fall asleep in the tub, do they end up face down? That sounds weird to me. Furthermore, I would think if you fall asleep and breath in water, it would make you wake up and cough, as your body struggles to get oxygen. It would be an automatic response.

They way Ryan says, "24", is notable to me. There is no signs of fear, sadness, or distress in voice.

The dispatcher says, "She in the water right now?" Ryan says, "Yes, the water's draining right now...I tried to do it...everything."

The dispatcher continues, "Have you taken her out of the water now?" and Ryan says, "Yeah, the water's completely drained and she's just laying here unconscious."

The dispatcher asks again, "She's still in the bathtub?" Ryan says, "Yeah".

WHAT? He didn't take her out of the tub the instant he found her? That's what a loving husband would do unless she was so large that he couldn't lift her, but I would expect him to say that, and beg for help if that was the case, but he doesn't do that either.

Also, the second time he says she is "unconscious". I thought he thought she was dead. Why would he jump to the conclusion she is dead immediately?? Most people hold out hope they can revive a loved one and don't give up so quickly, but Ryan seems to have given up when he called 911. That's very notable.

Ryan is intently listening. You can just feel it.

The dispatcher asks, "Have you tried CPR?" Ryan says, "As much as I could...what little bit I know." How do you do CPR on a victim who is in a bathtub, supposedly face down? You either know CPR or you don't...

The dispatcher says, "There is no way you can get her out of the tub." Ryan says, "I'll try, but I have to put the phone down." Why wouldn't he have done this earlier?

"I'll try?"...Caring husband, isn't he?

Notice Ryan was able to get his wife out of the tub without much effort. Why didn't he do this instinctively?

The dispatcher tells Ryan to give Sarah CPR, and Ryan doesn't ask for directions. You would think if he wants to save her life, he'd ask, "How do I do it?! I need help." Afterall, he already admitted to not knowing much about CPR. He doesn't. There is also no urgency when it comes to Ryan's actions at all. That is flat out inconsistent, if you ask me.

Listen to how Ryan says in the calmest of calm voices, "Okay, they are unlocked now" and then "we're upstairs". People who are truly distraught don't shift emotions so quickly.

Listen to the breaths Ryan makes into the phone. It doesn't sound like it is going into his wife's chest, does it? If you've done CPR, even if only on a dummy, it doesn't sounds like this! Hello!

The dispatcher doesn't pick up on the fact Ryan was doing CPR just there with those breaths and says, "Ryan I need you to put down the phone for me and do CPR, okay?" Ryan responds, "Yes, I am."

Doing CPR and holding the phone are not very compatible. Ryan thought he was doing CPR...maybe to the phone he was, but not to his wife.

We then hear Ryan in the background going "Come on, man...come on..." and then the call ends. He must think CPR is two breaths and that's it. He couldn't be more against saving his wife than he displayed in this call. Something is very wrong.

I think the jury got it right. There are way too many red flags in this 911 call for me!!

Labels: murder, Ryan Widmer

Loss of Emotional Control
by Eyes at 9:55 AM

Eyes for Lies reader, Karon, sent this interesting video to me about a basketball coach at Holy Family University who knocked down a player and called it an "accident". Lucky for the player, the incident was videotaped. I think most people will see this was not an accident, and the coach is trying to save his skin. He knows his job is at risk and rightfully so.

The guy knocked down, Matt Kravchuk, is upset because he doesn't believe the the coach's apology, and he is right to not accept it, if you ask me. I think most people will agree. Furthermore, he wants the school to take action against the coach as well.

The apology by the coach, John O'Connor, is interesting. He keeps repeating that what happened was "an accident" and that he didn't "intend" to do what he did. John has convinced himself of this, though it is clearly not true. He is in absolutely denial he has a problem. Sure he didn't plan this, but John's problem is that he had an emotional outburst where he momentarily lost control and lashed out and in that moment, he had a choice and he chose to act inappropriately. He wasn't able to stop himself from reacting physically when he was angered. That's scary--especially from someone who should be a role model to our children.

All people make mistakes, but to not own up to what truly happened, I don't think he should be forgiven. I would be much more likely to accept an apology from someone who said, "Listen, I lost my cool. It was wrong. I'm so sorry. It won't happen again." Humility goes a long way...

Instead he wants us to believe he making his team better players. Give me a break!

Labels: human emotions

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Expression of the Day
by Eyes at 2:03 PM

Labels: Expression of the Day

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Russell Williams
by Eyes at 12:14 PM

The story of Colonel Russell Williams was featured on Dateline this past weekend. For those of you who saw it, you might enjoy this video of his interrogation. It's in two parts. You can find it here.

Colonel Russell Williams was a high ranking military man in Canada who at one time flew the Queen of England around Canada. Well, he went from incredible highs to very big lows: At the height of his career, he broke into people's homes and stole womens underwear. Then he would try them on and take photos, as you see above. Crazy man! Well, sadly, his fantasy and obsessions turned even darker. He killed two women before he was caught by some good police work.

When I watched Russell Williams, I would characterize him as a low emotionally expressive person. He is what I would call neutral, and neutral people are challenging to read when you encounter them.

Williams hit me as a very intelligent man, who thought he was so smart, he could get away with his fantasies. When we saw him on Dateline in video footage the day after he killed those women, he has a glow of power that was intense. Did you see it? He was clearly on cloud nine for having done what he did, and he didn't have any remorse. He loved power and control. That drove him.

I suspect Williams was not an empathetic person in his life, and I think he learned to say what he had to to fit into society. I wonder if he always knew he was different. My hunches say it is likely...though we may never know.

On that note, ladies, if someone steals your underwear, take it DEAD serious. This is no laughing matter. It happened once to my cousin!! Flat out chilling...

Labels: Dateline NBC, murder, Russell Williams

Monday, February 21, 2011

Elisa Baker: Indicted on Murder
by Eyes at 5:39 PM

Elisa Baker was indicted on murder charges in the Zahra Baker case today. Click here to watch a video.

Here is a copy of the indictment.

Adam Baker, Zahra's biological father, did an interview with Australia's 60 Minutes which aired this weekend, but it has been blocked in the U.S. because of the pending case here in the U.S.

I reviewed Adam Baker in October when he talked about his missing daughter because he said he saw his daughter two days prior to reporting her missing, and I didn't believe him. It ends up police now believe Zahra was dead two weeks prior to him reporting her missing, which made his story a lie, as I predicted.

Thanks to everyone who shared links on this story.

Labels: aaron young, Adam Baker, Elisa Baker, murder, Zahra Baker

Scott Walker: Microexpression
by Eyes at 10:41 AM

A reader sent me this video on Facebook because there is a good microexpression in it. See if you can find it! Please refrain from any discussions on politics. This blog is about understanding people and spotting deception. Thanks!

I identify what the microexpression is in the comment section. Eyes for Lies reader, J, detailed it perfectly.

Labels: Microexpressions, Scott Walker

Saturday, February 19, 2011

48 Hours Preview for Tonight
by Eyes at 11:46 AM

If the video doesn't display correctly, click here.

Labels: 48 Hours

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Kori Cioca Talks About Rape and the Military
by Eyes at 1:38 PM

Several of you wondered if Kori was being sincere in the video above. Her emotions are absolutely genuine in this video.

I saw this article in the Washington Post online and I thought I'd share it with you. They reported:

"Even though the man confessed to having sex with her, Ms. Cioca said in the lawsuit she was told if she pressed forward with reporting the sex as a rape, she would be court-martialed for lying...”

From Kori's behavior, I do believe she was violated on some level. I haven't heard her talk of the details, so I cannot be specific, but I do believe she is expressing genuine pain and her behavior warrants further investigation into her claims...

Notice the tension in her forehead?

Ryan Ferguson Update
by Eyes at 12:28 PM

A petition was filed on Valentine's Day in the case of Ryan Ferguson that says the key testimony of two witnesses in his murder trial have now recanted their stories. See the story in the Columbia Tribune.

I have always believed in Ryan Ferguson's innocence. This is music to my ears!! You can read my original thoughts on this case back in 2006 here.

Labels: Chuck Erickson, murder, Ryan Ferguson

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Eyes for Lies Reader on the Equator
by Eyes at 8:52 AM

Where do you read Eyes for Lies blog?

Here is one reader in South America at the Equator with his feline friend! Click here for more information on his location! Very cool!!! Thanks, El Gato Pariante.

To see where other people read Eyes for Lies, click here. Will you share where you read Eyes for Lies?

Labels: Eyes for Lies readers

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Poll: Sherry Chason
by Eyes at 9:35 AM

Dateline NBC Sunday

Labels: Sherry Chason

Monday, February 14, 2011

Dateline Sunday: Freddie and Sherry Chason
by Eyes at 11:02 AM

photo © 2010 epSos .de | more info (via: Wylio)
Freddie and Sherry Chason were happily married couple by the accounts of all those who knew them. They were married for more than twenty years, and Freddie was known to call his wife "Ms. Sherry." His friends said they never heard him raise his voice to her...so what happened in 2008 was a big mystery. Sherry was a nurse and worked 12 hour shifts in a Tennessee hospital. Because Freddie snored, they slept in separate bedrooms.

Sherry Chason tells Dateline NBC Sunday night that she last saw her husband watching TV on Thursday night before she retired to bed. She said she clearly remembered him eating onion dip and drinking a soda as she said goodnight and retired to bed. On Friday morning, Sherry says she hollered to Freddie as she was "fixing to go out the door". I hollered and said, "I'm gone, Freddie. He didn't answer, I heard Freddie snoring, but I heard the alarm {ADT} turn on right before I went out the door."

Read moreI immediately find it odd that she is talking to Freddie without knowing if he is awake or not. What kind of relationship did these two have?

Sherry worked a 12 hour shift Friday, and Freddie was again in his own room according to Sherry, and she said when she came in at 8 PM, "Freddie was asleep... to my knowledge." Kate Snow asked, "Did you go in and say hello." Sherry says he was snoring and "I didn't go wake him up or anything."

"To my knowledge?" Notice the pause? Why didn't she tell us the first time, "When I came home, I heard him snoring." Snoring appears as an afterthought, doesn't it? It's notable.

You would think Freddie would be up at 8 PM, wouldn't you? He wasn't sick or dying, and he was only 52 years old, so why was he in bed all the time? It oddly doesn't seem to phase Sherry. From what I gathered on Dateline NBC, Freddie even owned a business, so how come it was so normal for him to be sleeping all the time? This flags me.

On Saturday morning, Freddie hadn't gotten up and she says, "... he had not gotten up and I didn't hear an alarm or anything.... which seemed a little unusual to me. I was going across the dining room to his bedroom, and I hollered, 'Hey Freddie, I thought you were going to get up' and when I rounded the corner into the room, that's when I found Freddie, and I called 911.

Yet to 911, Sherry says, "Yes ma'am...I just went in to check on my husband because he sounded funny, and he's all swoll up and he's got something coming out of his mouth and...I don't know what's wrong with him, but he's got something wrong." Dateline cuts the call and then you hear Sherry in a totally different demeanor say, "Can you hear that--that's him breathing!"

She is a nurse, mind you, and she wants the 911 dispatcher to hear how he is breathing? I find this very odd. I also find her change in demeanor striking.

When Kate Snow says, "You're a nurse (Sherry laughs and says "Yeah, "), when you saw that, what went through your head?" I thought he had a stroke, maybe or something because of his high blood pressure. I didn't really know."

I would think it is not common for something to come out of your mouth if you had a stroke, and a nurse would know that...

Yet in the 911 call Sherry continues, "I come out of the bathroom and I ran in there and I was going, 'What's wrong with you?'" It's a completely different story than what she told 911.

In Sherry's account to Dateline, she said she didn't hear the alarm go off, and she was "going across the dining room" when she hollered at Freddie, "I thought you were going to get up." She doesn't talk about hearing anything "funny". Yet in the 911 call, Sherry says she came out of the bathroom and ran in there going 'what's wrong with you'? because Freddie sounded "funny."

These are two very different accounts, and strongly suggests she doesn't have a true memory that morning or she wouldn't give us to very different stories. This is very telling to me.

It was later discovered through toxicology reports that Freddie died from taking a diabetes drug that put him into a coma, and he wasn't known to have diabetes. He was on life support and it didn't take but a couple of days before Sherry wanted it removed.

Sherry said, "I was afraid he was going to die...and I was afraid he was going to live........and be a vegetable." Notice the pause in her speech? And how the thoughts trail after that? If you are afraid someone is going to be a vegetable, you can take time to make the right decision, can't you? This statement bothers me.

Sherry says, "Anybody would know there was something really badly wrong, but I didn't ever suspect what was really wrong come to find out." This is a very odd statement.

I do not believe Sherry Chason's story. She seems to have no care in the world to figure out what happened to Freddie, either. If he ingested these diabetes drugs that were found in his system, was it her error? Did she ever bring that drug to her house from her mom's house (as we know that is the drug her mom took)? Could she have messed up his drugs as she was the one who dispensed them?

Most people would be devastated and would have recounted their steps 1000 times. They would have questioned if they did something by accident, but not Sherry. Yet we know she had access to this drug because her mom took it for her diabetes. And if she didn't do it, what on earth happened? You would think Sherry would want to know, but we don't see that side of Sherry. If she didn't do it, and he didn't have access to the drug, she should wonder if someone ELSE tried to murder him, but she doesn't care about that, either, apparently. She seems quite content accepting that she doesn't know what happened. Most wives wouldn't rest until they figured out what went wrong.

Sherry also is missing anger. If you are accusing me of killing my loved one, I am going to be angry and upset that you think I violated someone I loved, but we don't see any of that either. Nothing from where I sit makes sense.

Something is very fishy, if you ask me! A jury, however, did not convict Sherry Chason. She is a free woman still trying to clear her name...

Labels: Freddie Chason, Shery Chason

Friday, February 11, 2011

Expression of the Day
by Eyes at 10:39 AM

Labels: Expression of the Day

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Wendy Boyd: There was no affair
by Eyes at 3:26 PM

Labels: Amy Henslee, James Henslee, murder

James Henslee 911 Call with Follow-up by Police
by Eyes at 9:33 AM

Earlier this week I posted the 911 call from James Henslee reporting his wife missing, and in it, I found some inconsistencies. Eyes for Lies reader, Keith, found another released version of the 911 call, where police call back James to update him that they haven't located his wife, and to ask him more questions.

When the police ask him if there are any footprints leading away from the house, he says, "Ah...I couldn't tell of any this morning...cuz ah...like I said I left work a little after 10 when I couldn't get a hold of her...and I don't know what to think."

James' answer is odd here. He doesn't directly answer the question or say that he specifically looked. Or tell us that everything was shoveled so there was no way to know... He tells us he couldn't tell, but doesn't explain himself.

The detective asks him how long he thinks Amy's been gone from the house. James says,"Since probably 9:30, I would say." Had he talked to the neighbor already at this point to know this? How did he arrive at this time? Do we know when the neighbor told him about the information? I somehow thought it was Tuesday, but I don't know for sure.

When the dispatcher asks James if they were having problems, he answers this question differently than all the others. All the other questions when he say "no", or "nope", but to this question he says, "No sir" with a different voice inflection. It's notable.

James says, "Like I said, she locked out our front door because I had both sets of keys..um...its almost like she might have left with somebody and I'm not sure."

Did he leave her without keys? Why would he have both sets of keys? Why would she lock herself out of her own house?

These are oddities, again, but nothing conclusive, though it is a fact James has been inconsistent with us.

Labels: Amy Henslee, James Henslee, murder

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Amy Henslee's Friend Talks about Neighbor Sighting
by Eyes at 8:50 AM

Labels: Amy Henslee, James Henslee, murder

Monday, February 7, 2011

James Henslee 911 call
by Eyes at 10:37 AM

Police released James Henslee's 911 call. In the call, James tells police that he called home on his break and continued calling for 40 minutes before he left to go home to find out if his wife was okay because she didn't answer.

Read moreI find this tidbit interesting. How many people have called home to a loved one who didn't answer? Do you often panic and leave work within 40 minutes? Most people will typically wait a couple of hours or call neighbors. I find James time period of concern quite short.

There had to be other days where she was doing something where she couldn't hear the phone ring and didn't answer. One plausible scenario is that she went to get the dog off the chain and started talking to a neighbor. That could easily happen, couldn't it? Why did he rush home this day?

In this interview with WNDU, James says, ""My first initial thought, someone she knows must have stopped by and she must have gone to town or something real quick and she figured she'd be back because she knows I'm home by lunch."

He doesn't think about that until after he comes home? Obviously, from that statement, he believed Amy left the house at times when he was at work, so why the concern so instant on this day? Why couldn't he wait until lunch time?

In the 911 call, I am surprised James doesn't stress to the dispatcher that Amy has been missing for 6 and a half hours when he calls. This is notable. Most people would say, hey look, I've looked everywhere. I've called all of her friends, I've driven to town. I've waited 6 hours! Something is wrong. Instead when the dispatcher says call her friends, the first time he says, "Alright..." The second time he tells dispatchers that Amy doesn't associate with many people. There are two oddities here.

First, James doesn't tell the dispatcher that he drove down to town to look for Amy. Why? This is notable. In his WNDU interview, he said, "I took a cruise up town and still nothing and that's when I came back and she still wasn't here and I was starting to get a little worried."

Second, James says his wife didn't "associate with many people" to the dispatcher in the 911 call, yet in this interview he told us how outgoing and well liked Amy was. He said, "Everybody loved me and my wife."

You can't have it both ways...

Listen to how James inflects his voice when he says, "I don't know if she left with somebody...." I find his inflection odd...It's a hot spot for me.

When the dispatcher says, "Does she have a cell phone you can try calling her on?" James says "No". Why doesn't he say to the police, and oh yeah, she left her purse? Did he not know it at this point, or did he discover that right away? I'd be curious to ask family if they knew at that point because that is critical information for the police. If she doesn't have her purse, she likely won't have much money to go or do anything, which if James is worried about her, I think he'd want to share this, if he knew at this point.

Essentially, he should be saying, "Don't tell me to go look for her -- I already did!" But we don't hear this from James, ironically.

In this video, James just said something that really flags me. His wife has been missing for three days. The reporter asks James why he wants to take a polygraph and he says, "To rule me out and to get the person...or to find out whatever happened to the wife and the mother of my kids."

To get "the person"? How did he know that a person was involved? How come that was his first conclusion when he knew she left the house, locked the door and took her coat--which all seems voluntary.

Right now, there are many red flags in James' behavior that need further investigation in my eyes... He is not being forthright with people, but what he is hiding, it could be a multitude of things.

Labels: Amy Henslee, James Henslee

Friday, February 4, 2011

Amy Henslee Laid to Rest: James Speaks at Her Funeral
by Eyes at 9:07 AM

I notice a particularly odd behavior of James during the speech he gives at his wife's funeral yesterday, and I can't help but wonder, does James have a cold?

If you watch James speak, he has a rhythmic pattern of saying a sentence and then sniffling -- from the first sentence he says to the very last. I've never seen this before.

I watched closely to see if he was having trouble reading his eulogy, because of tears, or if he wiped away any tears, but neither happen. Tears would likely cause the eyes to well up and would make reading a eulogy difficult, but I don't see James struggling with that. Also, with tears, you can't hold sniffles back so precisely as to wait to finish each sentence, can you? They congest you up, cause you to drip and pause at inopportune times. Most people use a kleenex, or sniffle, but the sniffle isn't so perfectly timed.

Do you think this is odd behavior?

Furthermore, I don't see any stress in James' forehead. I don't see oblique eyebrows either. If anyone sees any close-up photos of James from this service, please let me know. I would like to see if there are truly tears...or if he has a cold...

Labels: Amy Henslee, James Henslee

Thursday, February 3, 2011

About YOU
by Eyes at 2:04 PM

photo © 2009 Andrew King | more info (via: Wylio)

What was the worst lie someone told you this week? Are most lies you encounter benign or hurtful?

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Expression of the Day
by Eyes at 11:24 AM

Labels: Expression of the Day

Disclaimer: All data and information provided on this site is for informational purposes only. Eyes for Lies Blog makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information on this site & will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its display or use. This is a blog and expresses opinions of the author. Just because Eyes for Lies does not believe someone does not mean they are (a) lying, or (b) a liar. All information is provided on an as-is basis. Eyes for Lies does not take any responsibility for comments published by its readers. Readers publish comments at their own risk. By reading this blog, you agree to the terms expressed in this link.

Copyright Notice 2004-2011
The content of this blog cannot in any way be reproduced, replicated, copied, duplicated or performed in any manner without express written permission from Eyes for Lies. You don't want to get caught in a lie, do you? Ask first.

Monday, February 28, 2011 Tiffany Hartley Speaks Out About New Life by Eyes at 8:18 AM

Friday, February 25, 2011 Ryan Widmer's 911 Call by Eyes at 11:52 AM

Loss of Emotional Control by Eyes at 9:55 AM

Thursday, February 24, 2011 Expression of the Day by Eyes at 2:03 PM

Wednesday, February 23, 2011 Russell Williams by Eyes at 12:14 PM

Monday, February 21, 2011 Elisa Baker: Indicted on Murder by Eyes at 5:39 PM

Scott Walker: Microexpression by Eyes at 10:41 AM

Saturday, February 19, 2011 48 Hours Preview for Tonight by Eyes at 11:46 AM

Thursday, February 17, 2011 Kori Cioca Talks About Rape and the Military by Eyes at 1:38 PM

Ryan Ferguson Update by Eyes at 12:28 PM

Wednesday, February 16, 2011 Eyes for Lies Reader on the Equator by Eyes at 8:52 AM

Tuesday, February 15, 2011 Poll: Sherry Chason by Eyes at 9:35 AM

Monday, February 14, 2011 Dateline Sunday: Freddie and Sherry Chason by Eyes at 11:02 AM

Friday, February 11, 2011 Expression of the Day by Eyes at 10:39 AM

Thursday, February 10, 2011 Wendy Boyd: There was no affair by Eyes at 3:26 PM

James Henslee 911 Call with Follow-up by Police by Eyes at 9:33 AM

Wednesday, February 9, 2011 Amy Henslee's Friend Talks about Neighbor Sighting by Eyes at 8:50 AM

Monday, February 7, 2011 James Henslee 911 call by Eyes at 10:37 AM

Friday, February 4, 2011 Amy Henslee Laid to Rest: James Speaks at Her Funeral by Eyes at 9:07 AM

Thursday, February 3, 2011 About YOU by Eyes at 2:04 PM

Tuesday, February 1, 2011 Expression of the Day by Eyes at 11:24 AM

Monday, February 28, 2011

Tiffany Hartley Speaks Out About New Life
by Eyes at 8:18 AM

Friday, February 25, 2011

Ryan Widmer's 911 Call
by Eyes at 11:52 AM

Loss of Emotional Control
by Eyes at 9:55 AM

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Expression of the Day
by Eyes at 2:03 PM

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Russell Williams
by Eyes at 12:14 PM

Monday, February 21, 2011

Elisa Baker: Indicted on Murder
by Eyes at 5:39 PM

Scott Walker: Microexpression
by Eyes at 10:41 AM

Saturday, February 19, 2011

48 Hours Preview for Tonight
by Eyes at 11:46 AM

Thursday, February 17, 2011

Kori Cioca Talks About Rape and the Military
by Eyes at 1:38 PM

Ryan Ferguson Update
by Eyes at 12:28 PM

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Eyes for Lies Reader on the Equator
by Eyes at 8:52 AM

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Poll: Sherry Chason
by Eyes at 9:35 AM

Monday, February 14, 2011

Dateline Sunday: Freddie and Sherry Chason
by Eyes at 11:02 AM

Friday, February 11, 2011

Expression of the Day
by Eyes at 10:39 AM

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Wendy Boyd: There was no affair
by Eyes at 3:26 PM

James Henslee 911 Call with Follow-up by Police
by Eyes at 9:33 AM

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Amy Henslee's Friend Talks about Neighbor Sighting
by Eyes at 8:50 AM

Monday, February 7, 2011

James Henslee 911 call
by Eyes at 10:37 AM

Friday, February 4, 2011

Amy Henslee Laid to Rest: James Speaks at Her Funeral
by Eyes at 9:07 AM

Thursday, February 3, 2011

About YOU
by Eyes at 2:04 PM

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Expression of the Day
by Eyes at 11:24 AM