Scientists have identified 50
individuals who are able to spot deception with great accuracy after testing
more than 15,000 people. Eyes for Lies is one of the 50 people.
More
Eyes has a 97.3%
accuracy rate (to date) after identifying truth and deception in 37/38 people
before the truth was known by watching media clips.
Eyes for Lies is not psychic.
Amy Henslee was a stay at home mom in Michigan who went missing last week on Monday. According to her husband, he called her at home per his daily ritual at in the morning and when Amy didn't answer, he went home to check on her. When she wasn't home by 4 PM, he called the police to report her missing. The police didn't respond until 10 PM that night, thinking Amy left voluntarily, though she had no car and left her purse at home.
Read moreAmy's body was sadly found with her friend, Tonya Howarth, shot to death three days later. Howarth was dating Amy's husband's cousin, Junior Lee Beebe. Howarth and Beebe had be cohabitating on and off for several years.
In this video above, Amy's husband James talks about his wife.
James clearly doesn't have normal emotions--negative emotions--one would expect when a loved one is murdered. It definitely raises my eyebrows. He says, "Those big brown eyes--that smile, nobody could resist her."
James says, "It's been rough...you know, its been rough, but Amy's with me and she's keeping me strong for our kids and....because she wants...our kids to be happy... and so... I'm hanging in there."
James also shows no stress in his forehead, which is surprising.
About talking to the couples children about the murder of their mother, James say, "I just told them that I talked to God and ah...he said that he needed their mother top help him out, you know....so she can make a difference in the world--so she can help other people. That's wha...that's who she is...she's a helper. She helps everybody she can in any way. It's like she's always wanting to be in the hospital to help children, and she's always at the schools helping children, everything. She was put on this earth to help people, and she's going to keep helping people."
James seems to have no anger, no sadness--no negative feelings and it doesn't sit right with me. Why isn't he mad about his wife being murdered? Why isn't he upset that she is gone? He seems to have no problem accepting the outcome. He talks about her in past tense so its not shock or denial.
James says he lives in a great town, has great friends and family...everything appears to be just "great', doesn't it?
When he is asked what memory is keeping him warm right now, I see James Henslee shrug his shoulder as if he thinking, I don't know ... then he says, "Just that smile of hers and getting to tell her that I loved her everyday and the love -- that love keeps me holding on." Yet ironically, he is as empty as a tin can when he says it.
He says, "Just the way she says things and puts it out there, its just lovely." I'm not buying it.
The reporter says I would be remiss if I didn't ask you about DJ and all of that. James says, "You know I don't have a whole lot of information. I haven't talked to detectives or anything, and I haven't even had the TV on because its just hard to deal with, I have a lot going on and ah, Amy is just a great person and loving and we've had a tight relationship for years..."
You would think the first thing he would want to know is WHY???! but strangely he doesn't. This pings me as very unusual.
The reporter says, "Is there something you'd want to ask him?" and James shakes his head no. It's notable. Then he sighs in frustration and thinks. He then says after he shakes his shoulder implying he is thinking I don't know and says, "Ask him what the hell is wrong with him." Clearly, this was not an authentic response. If you notice, he shakes his head yes when he finishes as if he is confirming that was the right thing to say. It's a red flag. Then he has the subtlest expression of fear on his face that is almost not even measurable. You can almost feel his heart racing at this point. He is uncomfortable. Why is uncomfortable here?
When he is asked if he wants to say anything else, he ironically talks about the working dogs.
James talks about how the police need to respond as soon as someone thinks something is wrong, but in the same sentence he says, "We couldn't have stopped what had happened..."
WHAT?
How could he know that??? Most events can be stopped if we get there in time. Have police told him they know she was shot immediately? How could he know that his wife couldn't have been saved at that time? This bothers me. We need to do some fact checking. Has a time of death been floated around? Is there evidence they were shot on the spot and buried?
James says about calling Amy every day in the morning, "It's going to be hard to get back in that routine without being able to ah (smile, grin, shoulder shrug) associate with her like that, you know? And listen to that beautiful voice and come home to that smiling face, but thinking of that, keeps me strong."
Associate with her like that??
James doesn't act like a victim of a crime here, which he clearly is, if he had nothing to do with the crime. I think some digging is in order on this case.
I am suspicious of James from his behavior...and while this interview isn't conclusive, it puts me on high, high alert!
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
I ran into this video today by accident and found it to be really cool. Not only is the footage cool, but to see these athletes and dare-devils up-close during their high-risk sports and to not see any fear or high stress in their face -- mind-blowing!!
Do click full-screen to watch this high quality little camera at its best! And don't think it is expensive...these cameras start in the mid-$200 range. That's nbelievable. Wishing I was more of an athlete today! I'd get one of these little cameras. Very cool!
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Are you a distrusting person? Do you wonder what people's motives are often? Do you feel strangers will take advantage of you, if given the opportunity?
Old wisdom was if you are trusting, you're the fool. New research puts that belief to rest. The most trusting of people among us, research shows, are the best lie detectors, and I am not surprised.
As someone who sees lies frequently, I know that most lies are not mean nor malicious -- these are the rarity. Most lies are harmless, first and foremost, and really don't involve the person being lied to at all. But second, I believe harmful and malicious liars give away signals long before they are even aware of it, which gives me confidence I will spot them before I am hurt, so the reality is I don't worry about it.
In looking back at people who I have encountered who had bad intentions, I can tell you I was on to them long before they think they dropped a clue, and when I dropped them like a hot potato, they were typically stunned, often clueless as to why--not knowing the little inconsistencies they left as a trail leading up to them. It's rather funny in hindsight.
Scientists wonder how do people who trust people and who are good at spotting lies get that way. Is it because they take more risks, get more social exposure, and hence more experience? They learn from their mistakes? Or are they just more sensitive and have an innate ability that predisposes them to pick up the clues better than others -- hence giving them the confidence that they know they will spot the clues before they have worry?
I have to say I am not a risk taker. I prefer to calculate my odds and have a plan that has a good chance of succeeding. I also was not a highly social person in life either. I have always been quite content to spend my time alone. While I can be very outgoing when I am out, I am also quite happy to stay home, so I don't think for me it was due to lots of social exposure either. I personally think I was able to be comfortable with people because I innately saw the signs of danger before they were harmful to me, and that allowed me to become more trusting than I otherwise would have been.
Another synopsis of the research can be found here.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Diena Thompson gave a grant from the Somer Thompson Foundation to Billie Dunn to pay her bills for the month while she is going through this difficult time. BigCountryhomepage.com has the story and video.
Diena Thompson's daughter, Somer Thompson, went missing in 2009 and was later found in a landfill. After several months, police arrested a local guy for the murder, but his trial has not yet started.
Diena Thompson said to the reporter in tears, "Makes you feel like its you again, like its your story again."
"There aren't words in the English literature or any other, you know, language for me to express to anyone what it feels like to be in this situation--to be in this club that nobody wants to belong to, and the dues are way too high," said Diena.
Diena says, "I hope that Somer is looking down on her mommy, and proud."
Billie Dunn said, "For her to understand it so perfectly, um, there's things that she can tell me, things that I can tell her...we can talk about and we completely understand."
I have always found Diena Thompson to be unusual and I have always believed she knew more than she has told us.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Aaron Young, Elisa Baker's ex-husband of 10 years, speaks out about Zahra's death in an exclusive interview with News 14 Carolina. In this interview, Young talks about several things that I am confident he is being honest about. He tells us that Elisa was jealous of the attention that Zahra would get. He also tells us that Adam, Zahra's biological father, was a good guy and that he would do anything for anybody. I believe these are absolutely true.
Last he tells us that he thinks Elisa is capable of doing this horrible act by herself, which I believe Aaron truly believes. From what I see of Adam Baker myself, he was the typical nice guy, though nice guys do get caught up in the spells of psychopaths, unfortunately.
I do not think that Aaron Young was involved in killing Zahra Baker. I believe him here. I was confused when he said in the first video that he has had nothing to do with Elisa since February, but in the third video he said he took Zahra swimming with five other children in August, but I suspect he was with Adam and Zahra and not Elisa, but I would double check that if I could...just to be sure.
Read my opinion of Zahra's biological father, Adam Baker, here.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Here is an interesting article on the Stacey Burns murder, which talks about her husband's behavior. Ed Burns apparently had Stacey quite afraid of him--at one point threatening to cut off "body parts". Another time he woke her at 4 a.m., was standing over her and told her "death or divorce". Ed was not happy about hearing his wife wanted to separate from him. Witnesses also told the court, when Stacy filed for an emergency restraining order, that Ed burned her clothes and cosmetics.
Stacey got a restraining order against Ed in 2007 for a year, and a year later, she got it renewed by a judge for a 5 year period, but during that time, she softened again, and let Ed back into her life for her children's sake. And it didn't take long for Ed to petition to the court to remove the restraining order. That was late in 2008 and by Mother's Day she was found murdered.
Stacey had told the court about Ed, "I feel afraid of what Ed would do if the restraining order was lifted. I am fearful of Ed coming into my house while myself and my five children are there."
Past behavior, as Dr. Phil says, is often a good predictor of future behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
On tonight's episode of Nancy Grace: America's Missing - a show that aims at finding 50 people in 50 days - on HLN, Grace will be conducting an in-depth expose of Austin resident, Julie Ann Gonzalez, who disappeared in March 2010.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Friday night ABC's 20/20 ran a show on Stacey Burns, who was murdered on Mother's Day. Her body was left by the killer to be found by her children Mother's Day morning. The show profiles two individuals who could be responsible for her killing: her ex-husband and an ex-boyfriend.
It's a truly perplexing mystery. The ex-husband had made threats against his wife, and she had a restraining order against him. He ex-boyfriend was somewhat obsessed by her according to friends, and his DNA was found under her fingernails.
While watching the interview, I have gut belief at who is responsible, but from the interview, there were no concrete clues that were leaked out, unfortunately. It's much like the Hailey Dunn case. I have a gut instinct, but there is not hard behavioral evidence in these two cases that will give me what I need to make a definitive decision based on behavior. That doesn't mean that these two cases can't be solved by behavioral evidence, it just means I'd need to ask more direct questions myself to get to the truth. Not all interviews will provide the questions to leak the clues...
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Steve Kardian and I talked about Denise Vernier as her body was recently found after she went missing in September from Ontario, Canada. Steve Kardianhas over 30 years experience as a career law enforcement officer, detective, sergeant and chief criminal investigator. Steve shares his thoughts with us:
From a law enforcement perspective, I find it extremely out of the ordinary under the circumstances that the authorities have publicly stated that they do not believe that foul play was involved in the death of Denise Vernier. Denise was found in an area obviously not very accessible to the public, the time period she's been missing is lengthy, the couple was separated according to her brother, and her husband may have been the last person to see her alive.
The possibility exists that the remains were found in such a way that it may appear to have been an accident, however, the autopsy will likely yield the cause of death (accidental, intentional, natural causes or inconclusive). Dental records are the fastest way to determine a person's identity and I suspect that her body was in a fairly advanced state of decomposition due to the the fall weather, plus wildlife may have got to her. It's always easier from a LE prospective to go from a suspicious death investigation to non-suspicious rather then the other way around. A lot of evidence can be lost in the process.
That being said law enforcement will refrain from labeling someone a person of interest or suspect until they have exhausted most, if not all of their attempts to extract information/cooperation from a subject. The old adage keep your friend close and your enemies closer is true to life. LE wants to be your friend for as long as possible and before you retain counsel. Often the guilts party believes that he is smarter than LE and we want him to keep thinking that way!
Thanks, Steve!!
Steve Kardian is one the nation’s go-to experts on issues of women’s safety, crime prevention and risk reduction. Steve is a national media consultant for Inside Edition, CNN, Fox News, The Morning Show, CBS, NBC, Men’s Journal, the New York Times, Best Life Magazine, USA Today, the Wall Street Journal and Sports Illustrated. Steve Kardian is called upon by the national media to offer solutions and interpretations to many of the nation’s most high profile cases.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
A second man has been arrested in connection with the Jo Yeates murder, 32-year old Vincent Tabak, who lived next door to Jo with his girlfriend.
Chris Jeffries, 65, was arrested in late December, and he has since given police a DNA sample according to news reports and says he expects to be cleared soon. He has also talked of suing the media and police for harming his reputation. He was a unique character to say the least.
If any footage comes up of either man where they are willing to discuss the case, please let me know. Thanks, MA.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
What a fascinating story about how a woman felt she didn't fit in with her family and that something wasn't right. Through her beliefs, she followed through and did fact checking, which is essential when people are suspicious of lies. Fact checking is a basic step anyone can take.
A reader sent me this video today for another reason. The reader noticed that the mother in the video when her child was first missing didn't have tears in her eyes. He questioned if the mother was faking her emotions. She absolutely did not, but this is an excellent question. Some people do cry their eyes dry, and I suspect that is what happened here. If you look at the mother's eyes, they do look irritated and raw, which is supportive.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
A reader sent me this video of Sarah Palin's breathing, which was cut from her speech after the Arizona shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Gifford and her attendees. In the video, Sarah defends herself after people cast blame on her for "irresponsible statements".
I do not want this to become a discussion of politics, but I do think Sarah Palin communicated a strong message non-verbally in her speech and it is reflected in this cut version.
What non-verbal emotional messages is Palin sending in this video?
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Check out an article that was written about me in Malaysia. The study didn't happen in 2006. It actually occurred over two and a half decades. I participated in 2006.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
This is a fascinating case of honesty. Listen to the woman in the closet talk to 911 when she thinks the guy is in the house. Notice how she whispers?
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
On January 3, 2011, the body of Denise Vernier was found in a wooded area by some local kids in the city where she disappeared. Police identified her body through dental records and say they do not believe there was foul play and expect the case to be closed soon.
I wrote about Mike Vernier back in December and found his demeanor quite interesting and I believed he knew more than he was telling us. I still do. Whether he is simply withholding they had an argument or if there was more to it, I can't be certain, but he is holding something back.
I've looked for how they believe Denise Vernier died and I can't find anything, ironically. The Toronto Sun wrote, "Foul play is not suspected in the death, police say, though cause of death has not yet been determined."
How can you say there is no foul play if you don't know the cause of death? It was September when she disappeared so extreme exposure wouldn't happen immediately. According to Denise's brother, Denise and Mike were separated, yet her husband was the last one to see her. When Mike was asked when he last saw her, he said it was the "previous day" at first, before she disappeared, yet he then goes on to tell us later about how he talked to her the day of her disappearance. It's a notable inconsistency and his details are clearly lacking.
Here is my post on Mike Vernier. I'm perplexed to say the least. I will be waiting to see if they release the cause of death. If she died of natural causes, or exposure, why wouldn't they release that?
Unfortunately, the video I originally displayed of Mike Vernier has been removed from the Internet.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
KTXS.com has received copies of affidavits for search warrants in the case of missing Hailey Dunn, and what they found doesn't look good for Hailey's mom and boyfriend. In the affidavits, it states that Shawn Adkins had threatened the lives of both Billie and her daughter Hailey before. The affidavits also confirm that both Billie Dunn and her boyfriend, Shawn Adkins, failed the polygraph (though I don't put much weight in polygraphs).
Apparently, both Adkins and Dunn were also intensely fascinated with brutal crimes and horror films. From KTXS.com, "Seized in a box in their bedroom were numerous documents, some fictional and some past crimes, that covered such topics such as serial killers, ax murders, sexual sadistic activities, the occult, sex and death topics, motives for murder and mass murderers – including the killing of family members."
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
The tragedy in Arizona is heart wrenching, but I think there is a valuable learning lesson we can all take from this horrible situation. People in this video speak out about how Loughtner behaved inappropriately--eerily laughing at inappropriate times. This is key. We so often explain inappropriate behavior away--giving people the benefit of the doubt. This is a dangerous thing to do. More people need to take notice and band together when they see inappropriate behavior.
I am a firm believe that as a society we have become so politically correct that we have lost touch with reality. We are afraid to speak the truth. When we see something inappropriate, we are all scared to speak up and say so publicly for fear of being shunned. Hence we retreat, and allow these people free license to continue in their out-of-bound behavior, which can become out of control.
While I do not advocate confronting a person who is acting inappropriate, I do think more of us should reach out to those who may have influence on people like this, such as family members, to get them to seek help. If enough people did this, it might have spurred on Loughner's parents to take more appropriate steps to see if there was anything that could be done for their son before it was too late.
We need to stop being so politically correct. I believe it is an ill of society that is causing us more detriment than good. What do you think?
Do you feel safe to speak out against someone's inappropriate behavior? Or do you feel you will be shunned?
BTW: This photo on the post (for the video) was reported to be his mug shot. I can't imagine...
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
DPS Senior Trooper Sparky Dean said to BigCountryHomepage.com about the Hailey Dunn case yesterday, "The family has not been forthcoming. Their discernment of the truth continues to change. Very frustrating."
My Opinion
I know many of you have stated that you believe and trust Hailey's mom. I have watched Billie Dunn, Hailey's mom, speak about her missing daughter, and I have not been able to come to any conclusions. At this point, I am perplexed by her lack of emotions in the videos I have watched regarding her daughter. Until I can make sense of it one way or another, I will remain neutral and undecided.
Please continue to provide video links of the family members speaking out. If I can come to a conclusion, I will promise you that you all will be the first to know.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Several of you are asking my opinion on the parents of 13-year old Haily Dunn, a cheerleader from Texas, who went missing just before the new year.
So far, I haven't seen enough good footage to make an opinion. If you see good footage of the boyfriend or the mother being asked solid questions about the situation, please post the links below in the comments. Thanks!
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
I just read news that PicApp, the web software that I was using to post legal expressions of the day, has discontinued their service of providing free content (photographs) to bloggers and others who used their images.
With that, I no longer have a source for expressions of the day. If anyone knows of a similar free service that has lots of photographs that are free to use for a blogger, please let me know. Otherwise, this feature will cease as well as I respect copyright laws.
Comment Policy: This blog is about understanding human behavior. You have the right to state your opinion if it is respectful. Disagreements are encouraged if they meet this standard. This blog is about deception and not about politics or religion--hence discussions on these topics will not be tolerated. Anyone who violates these general rules will be immediately banned. I have a zero tolerance for rude and disrespectful behavior.
Disclaimer:All data and information provided on this site is for
informational purposes only. Eyes for Lies Blog makes no representations as to
accuracy, completeness, currentness, suitability, or validity of any information
on this site & will not be liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in
this information or any losses, injuries, or damages arising from its
display or use. This is a blog and expresses opinions of the author. Just
because Eyes for Lies does not believe someone does not mean they are (a)
lying, or (b) a liar. All information is provided on an as-is basis. Eyes for Lies does not take
any responsibility for comments published by its readers. Readers publish comments at their own risk.
By reading this blog, you agree to the terms expressed
in this link.
Copyright
Notice 2004-2011
The content of this blog cannot in any way be reproduced, replicated, copied,
duplicated or performed in any manner without express written permission from
Eyes for Lies. You don't want to get caught in a lie, do you? Ask first.
